论文部分内容阅读
行政诉讼法第30条规定:“代理诉讼的律师,可以依照规定查阅本案有关材料,可以向有关组织和公民调查、收集证据”。这是行政诉讼法赋予律师在代理被告的诉讼中享有的调查、收集证据的权利。行政诉讼法第33条规定:“在诉讼过程中,被告不得自行向原告和证人收集证据”。这是行政诉讼法对被告在诉讼过程中调查、收集证据权利的限制。目前,在法学界和司法界有一种观点认为,行政诉讼中被告调查、收集证据的权利被限制,而代理被告行政诉讼的律师却享有调查、收集证据的权利,这是不能成立的,因而主张代理被告行政诉讼的律师不能在诉讼中调查、收集证据。笔者认为,这种观点有失偏颇,不敢苟同。
Article 30 of the Administrative Procedure Law stipulates: “A lawyer acting on behalf of a lawsuit may, in accordance with the provisions, inspect the relevant materials in this case and may investigate and collect evidence from relevant organizations and citizens.” This is the right of the Administrative Procedure Law to give lawyers the right to investigate and collect evidence in the course of acting on behalf of the defendants. Article 33 of the Code of Administrative Procedure stipulates: “During the proceedings, the defendant is not allowed to collect evidence from plaintiffs and witnesses themselves.” This is the limitation of Administrative Procedure Law on the defendant’s right to investigate and collect evidence during the proceedings. At present, there is a view in the jurisprudence and judicial circles that the defendants’ rights to investigate and collect evidence in administrative litigation are limited, while the lawyers who represent administrative defendants in the defendant have the right to investigate and collect evidence. Therefore, the claim can not be established Lawyers representing the defendant in administrative proceedings can not investigate and collect evidence in the proceedings. I believe that this view is biased, I do not agree.