论文部分内容阅读
目的系统探究针对急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常患者实施胺碘酮药物治疗的临床效果,为临床医师切实改善优化急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常患者的临床治疗处置效果提供经验借鉴。方法择取我院临床收治的急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常患者100例作为研究对象,按就诊时间随机分为研究组和参照组各50例,参照组采用利多卡因药物治疗,研究组予以胺碘酮药物治疗,观察比较两组患者的临床治疗有效率、PR间期持续时间、QRS波时限,以及室性心律失常发生次数。结果接受药物治疗处置后,研究组患者的临床治疗有效率,显著高于参照组患者(P<0.05)。研究组患者的PR间期持续时间,明显长于参照组患者(P<0.05)。研究组患者的QRS波时限和室性心律失常发生次数,均显著低于参照组患者(P<0.05)。结论针对急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常患者给予胺碘酮药物治疗,能够显著提高患者的临床治疗有效率,优化患者的基础性临床指标,值得在临床实践中推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of amiodarone on patients with ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction and to provide experience for clinicians to effectively improve the clinical effect of patients with ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction. Methods 100 cases of ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital were selected as study subjects, randomly divided into study group and reference group of 50 cases according to the time of treatment, the reference group was treated with lidocaine, and the study group was given Amiodarone drug treatment, observed and compared the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients, PR interval duration, QRS wave duration, and the number of ventricular arrhythmias. Results After receiving medical treatment, the clinical efficacy of the study group was significantly higher than that of the reference group (P <0.05). The duration of PR interval in the study group was significantly longer than that in the reference group (P <0.05). The study group patients with QRS wave duration and ventricular arrhythmia frequency were significantly lower than the reference group (P <0.05). Conclusion Amiodarone administration in patients with ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction can significantly improve the efficiency of clinical treatment and optimize the basic clinical indicators of patients, which is worth promoting in clinical practice.