似乎我们总喜欢把自己关注的人放在天平两端,手里拿着砝码——诸如“天赋、气质、努力”等物——逐个添上,总想比较出哪个更重,可最后却发现,当你在“天赋”上给一个人多加了500克,就一定在感情的催使下给另一个人的“努力”多加半公斤,最后的结果还是难分轩轾。这是必然的,因为你只是在单纯地比较这两个人,而并不是将他们置入一个大环境中,衡量他们对一件事物的影响力有多大。比如说,你可以无责任地臆测吕布和曹操的“综合能力”不相上下,但却无法否认,后者对历史的影响远远大于前者。明白我的意思了吗?我只是想问问:本赛季的得分王和连续两届MVP的获得者,哪一个对篮球,对自己的球队影响更大?我明知道这种比较不太讨好,因为天平两端都埋伏着大量口水和板砖。但是,当湖人和太阳相遇,当“团队”的首领遇见“个体”的领袖,就成了势在必行的事。 It seems that we always like to focus our attention on both ends of the scale, holding weights - such as “talent, temperament, hard work ” and other things - one by one, always want to compare which is heavier, But found that when you add 500 grams to a person on the “gift of talent,” you must add another half kilogram to the “effort” of another person under the urging of your emotions. The final result is still indifferent. This is inevitable because you are simply comparing the two, rather than putting them in a situation where they measure how much influence they have on one thing. For example, you can assume without charge that Riboud and Cao Cao’s “comprehensive ability” are comparable, but it can not be denied that the latter has a far greater impact on history than the former. I just want to ask: I would like to ask this season’s scoring champion and two consecutive MVP winners, which one on basketball, on their own teams more influential? I know this is not pleasing , Because the balance at both ends of an ambush with a lot of saliva and brick. However, when the Lakers meet the Sun, it becomes imperative that the leader of the “Team” meet the leader of the “individual.”