传统历史教育大多采用苏联凯洛夫的“五段教学模式”———“激发动机”“复习旧课”“讲授新课”“运用巩固”“检测效果”。应该承认这一模式符合学生的认知规律,是常规教学常用的一种模式。但是这一模式又有其自身的不足,即过于强调教师的主导作用,忽视学生的主体地位,存在? Most of the traditional history education used the Soviet Union’s Kalev’s “five-stage teaching model” - “excited engine”, “review of old lessons,” “taught new lessons,” “use consolidation,” and “detection effects.” It should be admitted that this model is in line with the cognitive laws of students and is a common model for conventional teaching. However, this model has its own shortcomings, that is too much emphasis on the leading role of teachers, ignoring the student’s dominant position, exist?