论文部分内容阅读
近年来西方经济学家发现在两种社会制度之间出现了一种有趣的现象:资本主义大讲计划、大讲福利、大讲工人管理;社会主义则大讲自由、大讲竞争、大讲利润和物质刺激。由是他们幻想出一套所谓的“趋同论”。这种说法虽然是不科学的,但却反映了一个事实,那就是资本主义由于衰老而日子不好过,社会主义则由于年青经验不足而没有把日子过得理想。大家都要治病,都在求医,都想从别人那里找到给自己治病的良药。但是衰老病和幼稚病总是不同的。八九十岁的老太婆不管吃什么补药也不能返老还童,幼稚病倒是可以从老年人走过的道路中得到教益。二者的前途总
In recent years, Western economists have found an interesting phenomenon between the two social systems: capitalism stresses planning, stresses benefits, and stresses worker management; while socialism speaks of freedom and competition, Profit and material stimulation. The reason is that they have come up with a so-called “convergence theory.” This statement, though unscientific, reflects the fact that capitalism is not as good as it is because of aging and that socialism does not live up to its expectations due to its lack of young experience. Everyone needs medical treatment and is seeking medical treatment. He wants to find some good medicine for others to cure himself. But aging and infancy are always different. The old women in their 80s and 90s can not be rehabilitated regardless of what they eat, and they can benefit from the path taken by the elderly. The future of both