论文部分内容阅读
在《著作权法》第三次修订中,引进了发源于北欧国家的延伸性著作权管理制度,从而也引起了较大的社会争议。延伸性著作权管理制度的理论基础需要探究的是延伸性著作权管理制度产生或出现的根源,从而梳理出该制度的是否存在一定的必然性。通过梳理,发现目前存在经济效率说和集体协商传统说两种理论。两种理论各有优缺点,就内容与逻辑而言也都有无法自圆其说之处。严格来说,两种理论甚至不能算是深层次的理论基础,延伸性著作权管理更多是特定国家特定环境下的产物,具有很强的工具性特征。
In the third revision of the Copyright Law, the introduction of an extended copyright management system originated in the Nordic countries has also caused a great social controversy. The theoretical basis of the durative copyright management system needs to explore the origin of the durative copyright management system, so as to sort out whether there is a certain inevitability of the system. Through combing, we find that there are two theories of economic efficiency and collective negotiation tradition. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, both in terms of content and logic. Strictly speaking, the two theories can not even be regarded as deep-seated theoretical basis. Extensive copyright management is more of a product of a specific country-specific environment and has a strong instrumental character.