论文部分内容阅读
我国《民事诉讼法》以及相关司法解释的规定中对自认与当事人陈述、自认与认诺没有加以区分,对诉讼上自认的对象、效力、自认形成的程序性前提以及诉讼外自认或是没有明确规定或是没有规定。针对上述存在的问题,本文提出了在民事诉讼的相关立法上应明确区分上述两组概念,而且对诉讼上自认制度和诉讼外自认制度也提出了相应的完善对策。
China’s “Civil Procedure Law” and the provisions of the relevant judicial interpretations make no distinction between self-identified and litigant statements, self-identified and agreed upon, and have no prejudice on the objects, effects, procedural preconditions formed by themselves, Whether there is no clear or explicit regulation or no regulation In view of the above existing problems, this paper proposes that the two groups of concepts should be clearly distinguished from each other in the relevant legislation of civil litigation, and corresponding countermeasures are also put forward for the litigation self-admitting system and the self-admitting system of litigation.