论文部分内容阅读
近年来,伴随着居委会地位的提高、力量的加强、条件的改善,居委会的工作任务越来越重,其中行政化色彩似乎也越来越浓。尽管许多地方在探索如何摆脱这种困境的过程中,出现了广东的“议行分设”制度、宁波市的“选聘分离”以及南京市的民间组织进社区的尝试,但居民自治的路究竟该怎么走?似乎还没有很好的答案。近日记者再次来到曾强化了居委会行政化色彩制度的始作俑者—上海市“街聘民选”的部分居委会,看到了这里社区改革又有了新的走向。
In recent years, with the improvement of the status of neighborhood committees, the strengthening of power and the improvement of conditions, the work tasks of neighborhood committees are getting heavier and heavier, and the administrative color seems to be getting stronger and stronger. Although many places have explored how to get out of this dilemma, some systems such as the “separation of the two countries” in Guangdong Province, the “separation of employment by election” in Ningbo and the involvement of non-governmental organizations in the community in Nanjing appear in many places. However, what is the road of residents’ autonomy? How to go? There seems to be no good answer. Recently, reporters once again came to intensify the reform of the administrative colorization system of neighborhood committees - Shanghai “street to hire people for election” part of the neighborhood committee, saw here community reform has a new trend.