论文部分内容阅读
目的:对改良新式剖宫产与传统剖宫产的临床疗效进行分析研究。方法:随机抽取100例2013年3月~2014年3月在我院行剖宫产手术的患者作为研究对象,按手术方式将52例选择改良新式剖宫产的产妇设为观察组,将48例选择传统剖宫产手术的产妇设为对照组,观察并比较两组相关临床指标。结果:观察组患者有2例腹膜前筋膜出血者,无腹壁下血管损伤及切口感染者,与对照组比较差异显著(P<0.05);观察组患者术中出血量少于对照组,患者平均手术时间、娩胎时间、排气时间和住院时间均短于对照组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论:改良新式剖宫产可有效减少产妇术中出血量,缩短住院时间,对产妇术后恢复和伤口愈合均具有积极意义,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of improved new cesarean section and traditional cesarean section. Methods: A total of 100 patients undergoing cesarean section in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were randomly selected as the research object. Fifty-two patients selected for improved cesarean section were selected as the observation group and 48 Cases choose the traditional cesarean section maternal as a control group, observed and compared the two groups of related clinical indicators. Results: There were 2 cases of preperitoneal fascia hemorrhage in the observation group, no blood vessels in the inferior abdominal wall and incision infection, there was significant difference compared with the control group (P <0.05). The bleeding volume in the observation group was less than that in the control group. The mean operation time, delivery time, exhaust time and hospitalization time were shorter than those in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The new cesarean section can effectively reduce the maternal blood loss, shorten the length of hospital stay, have a positive effect on maternal postoperative recovery and wound healing, which is worthy of clinical application.