论文部分内容阅读
本文同意陈尚君、汪涌豪所提出的《二十四诗品》非司空图所作及《二十四诗品》出自《诗家一指》的观点，但认为其所提出的明怀悦作《诗家一指》包括《二十四诗品》的观点是错误的。明初赵谦《学范》引用过《一指》，较怀悦的时代早七十余年。《天一阁书目》著录怀悦编集《诗家一指》，并录怀悦叙，可证《诗家一指》非其所作。本文考察了《诗家一指》的不同版本系统，认为史潜刊《新编名贤诗法》本题名为《虞侍书诗法》的本子更接近原貌，从而根据版本及有关材料认为《诗家一指》包括《二十四诗品》的作者有可能是元代的虞集。
This article agrees with Chen Shang-jun and Wang Yong-hao’s view that “Twenty-Four Poems” and “Twenty-Four Poems and Articles” are derived from “Shi Shi Yi Zhi”. However, One finger “includes” twenty-four poems “point of view is wrong. The early Ming Zhao Qian ”study“ quoted ”one finger“, more than seventy years earlier than the Wyatt era. ”Tianyi Pavilion bibliography“ Huai Yue compilation of ”a poet“ and recorded Huai Yue Syria, may prove ”a poet“ is not what they did. This paper examines the different versions of the ”Shi Shi Yi Zhi“ system, that the history of the new book ”Poems of the poem,“ the title of ”Yu Yu Shishu Method“ book closer to the original appearance, which according to the version and the material that ”poet One refers to “include” Twenty-four poetry, "the author may be Yu Yuan Yu Ji.