论文部分内容阅读
再严密的监察制度,也有作用消涣的时候。譬如,清朝的监察制度是比较细密的,然而好多大案要案露出丑恶面目来,则与监督机构没有什么关系。最明显的是“王直望案”。王亶望的案子引起乾隆的注意,并不是各路御史奏报、弹劾的结果,而是与阿桂、和坤在甘肃平定苏四十三作乱有关。乾隆四十六年(1781年)三月,甘肃省河州爆发了苏四十三领导的回民起义。经过几次交战,官兵损兵败北不能速胜。乾隆很生气,撤了陕甘总督勒尔谨的职。时任甘肃布政使的王廷赞,主动向乾隆上奏,说现在正是用兵之际,军费紧张,自己乐意把平时积攒的4万两廉俸银贡献出来,“以资兵饷”。乾隆皇帝见王廷赞一出手就是在万两银子,觉得奇怪:
A closer supervision system also has a role to eliminate. For example, the inspection system in the Qing Dynasty was relatively detailed. However, many major cases reveal ugly faces and have little to do with the supervisory bodies. The most obvious is “Wang straight hope ”. The case of Wang Guowang aroused the attention of Qianlong was not the result of the reporting and impeachment of the Censor in the history of the Yushu route but was related to the assault by the Kui-ping and Su-k’ai in the Gansu province. Forty-six years of Qianlong (1781) In March, the Muslim uprising led by Su-43 took place in Hezhou, Gansu Province. After several engagements, the officers and soldiers lost their troops and defeated the North can not win quickly. Qianlong is very angry, withdrew the Governor of Shaanxi and Gansu and Lelgan. Wang Tingzan, then governor of Gansu Province, took the initiative to play a leading role in Qianlong. He said that it was just the occasion of military use that military expenditures were intense and he was willing to contribute 40,000 taels of pension funds that he normally accumulated. Qianlong emperor saw Wang Tingzan a shot in the million two silver, I find it strange: