一、问题的提出在我国的法学课程体系中,法理学早已被确定为法学的基础课程,但法理学的正确定位问题并未解决。长期以来,法理学一直与哲学似乎更有联系,这影响了把法理学作为法学的一个有机组成部分予以建设的进程。法学的各应用学科客观上需要作为法学一般性理论学科的法理学的指导,但目前的法理学还不具备充分发挥这种作用的功能,这导致法理学与各应用法学之间都会相互抱怨对方不理解自己。其重要原因在于,法理学的法学特色体现得不明显,成了哲学、法律历史学、政治学、法学 First, the problem raised In our country’s legal curriculum system, jurisprudence has long been identified as the basic course of law, but the correct positioning of jurisprudence has not been resolved. For a long time, jurisprudence has always seemed more connected with philosophy, affecting the process of building jurisprudence as an integral part of jurisprudence. The various applied disciplines of law need objectively as the guidance of the jurisprudence of the general theory of law, but the current jurisprudence does not yet have the function of giving full play to this role, which leads to mutual complaints between jurisprudence and various applied jurisprudence. Do not understand myself. The important reason is that jurisprudence’s legal characteristics are not obvious, has become a philosophy, legal history, political science, law