论文部分内容阅读
1965年11月10日,《文汇报》奉命发表了姚文元的《评新编历史剧“海瑞罢官”》,诬陷它是一株反党反社会主义的“大毒草”,引起文艺界、史学界、哲学界的巨大反响。吴晗被迫在报上作了自我批评。然而,社会上对姚文元文章和吴晗检讨的反响已无足轻重。政界或上层的态度成了人们关心的焦点。概括起来,围绕着评《海瑞罢官》及吴晗的检讨,上层主要有如下四种异见:
On November 10, 1965, Wen Wei Po was ordered to publish Yao Wenyuan’s “Comment on New Historical Play” by Hai Rui Dismissed from Office. “It accused it of being a” poisonous poison “of anti-Party and anti-socialism and caused great repercussions in literary and art circles, historians, The great repercussions of the philosophical community. Wu Han was forced to make a self-criticism in the newspaper. However, the social response to the review of Yao Wenyuan’s article and Wu Han has been insignificant. Politics or the attitude of the upper class has become the focus of attention. To sum up, there are mainly four kinds of disagreement on the upper levels around the review of ”Hai Rui Dismissed from Office" and Wu Han: