目的:观察传统提肛运动治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效,比较与Kegel运动、生物反馈电刺激等疗法的区别。方法:160例轻、中度患者分为传统提肛组、Kegel组、电刺激组、Kegel+电刺激组,每组40例,分别进行3个月治疗。结果:4组总有效率分别为传统提肛组95.0%、Kegel组82.5%、电刺激组80.0%、Kegel+电刺激组85.0%。结论:4组均有较好疗效,但传统提肛运动因依从性好、简便高效、无成本,因此可作为普及型康复技术在基层推广。 Objective: To observe the effect of traditional levator ani exercise on female stress urinary incontinence, and to compare the difference between Kegel exercise and biofeedback stimulation. Methods: A total of 160 mild and moderate patients were divided into the traditional anus group, Kegel group, electric stimulation group and Kegel + electric stimulation group, 40 cases in each group, and were treated for 3 months respectively. Results: The total effective rates of the four groups were 95.0% for traditional levator ani group, 82.5% for Kegel group, 80.0% for electrical stimulation group and 85.0% for Kegel + electrical stimulation group. CONCLUSION: All four groups have good curative effect, but the traditional anal activity has good compliance, simple and efficient, no cost, so it can be popularized at the grassroots level as universal rehabilitation.