加大政治选择题的难度,命题人往往是在选择题的题肢设计上“做手脚”。比较典型的做法有两种:一是设计本身表述错误而考生很难识破(即似是而非)的题肢。在与题意吻合度较高的情况下,这类题肢很容易造成考生的误选(注:逆向选择题不在此列)。二是设计涉及考生容易混同的知识的题肢。因此,提高选择题的正答率,就不能不对这两类题肢进行科学的、系统的研究。笔者在多年从事高三毕 Increase the difficulty of political choice, the proposition is often in the choice of the title of the limb design “hands and feet ”. There are two typical ways: First, the design itself is misrepresented and the examinee is hard to see (ie plausible) of the limbs. In the case of a high degree of coincidence with the title, such subjects are likely to cause misleading candidates (Note: adverse choice is not here). The second is the design of subjects involved in the confusion of knowledge of the testicles. Therefore, to raise the positive rate of multiple-choice questions, we can not but scientifically and systematically study these two types of limbs. I have been engaged in high school for many years completed