论文部分内容阅读
“涊”字已见于上古(考虑到此字所有一字库均无,文中应用频率高,排版制字的困难,本文该字一般用“它”代之), 曾因假借作过“梁、粱”二字(词),而使它后来又成为“梁,粱”二字声符之事实,拙文《“（?）”字及其读音》(见《萍乡高专学报》1994年3期)里已有论证.在此基础上,本文只就它的上古造字时的本音及后来的变音、至今音等情况作较详的讨论.、以补原《“(?)”字及其读声》的不足.由于它仅见于先秦金文而不见于上古字书及其他文献,所以,上古以后的文献无处可觅其踪迹,所有字书、韵书则不可能有为它注音的直接材料.它的拟音只能另辟(?)径,其中关键的是它上古造字之初本音的拟定.
“涊” has been found in the ancient words (taking into account all the characters in this word are not, the frequency of the application of high frequency, the difficulty of typesetting the word, the text of this word generally use “it” instead) “(Word), so that it later became the” Liang, Liang “character of the word, Zhuo Wen” (?) “And its pronunciation” (see “Pingxiang Institute of Technology” 1994 the third period) On this basis, this article only on its ancient when the original pronunciation of the word and the later umlauts, so far tone and so on for a more detailed discussion, to complement the original “(?)” And its Because it only found in the Pre-Qin Jin Wen but not seen in the ancient textbooks and other documents, so after ancient literature can not trace its traces, all the text books, rhyme book can not have a direct Material. Its fake tone can only be opened (?) Trail, which is the key to the ancient tone of the original pronunciation of its formulation.