本案的争议焦点在于原被告之间是否成立货运代理合同关系。由于缺少明确的书面协议,且单证定性不明和证明内容模糊,最终导致原告方败诉。本文根据各项法律规定、实务中的单证缮制和交易习惯,对原告货代企业在本案中的身份、其所出具单证的性质和效力进行明确,以析疑义。 The focus of controversy in this case lies in whether the original defendant established a freight forwarder contractual relationship. Due to the lack of a clear written agreement, and the unidentified documents and vague evidence, eventually leading to the plaintiff lost. Based on various laws and regulations, the practice of the document Shanzhi and trading habits, the plaintiff freight forwarding companies in the identity of the case, the nature and validity of the documents issued by a clear, to analyze the doubt.