论文部分内容阅读
黄永年先生近年发表了《<忠王李秀成自述>原稿抽毁辨》一文,力持《自述》原稿未被抽毁说。早在1982年钱远镕先生在《学术月刊》上也发表了《李秀成<书供>原稿未被撕毁——与罗尔纲先生商榷》一文。我有些不同看法,提出来求教二位先生和读者。一、黄先生提出的《自述》原稿未被抽毁的观点,是不能成立的。 (一)黄先生说:《自述》原稿,“如被抽毁过,必然会按照不同的抽毁方式留下不同痕迹,但在这个写有原稿的簿子上找不见任何痕迹。”如果其中某些整页被抽毁,则被抽去
In recent years, Mr. Huang Yongnian published an article entitled “Zhaowang Li Xiucheng’s Self-Describing> Original Drafts”, holding “Manuscripts” without being destroyed. As far back as 1982, Mr. Qian Yuanrong also published a paper entitled “Li Xiucheng’s Book for Manuscripts Not Torn up - A Discussion with Mr. Luo Ergang” in the “Academic Monthly”. I have some different opinions, put forward to ask for advice two gentlemen and readers. First, the viewpoint of “self-report” manuscript put forward by Mr HUANG can not be established. (A) Mr Wong said: “The original manuscript,” if it was destroyed, will inevitably leave different marks according to different methods of wiping out, but no trace can be found on this original manuscript. "If one of them The whole page was destroyed, it was taken away