论文部分内容阅读
目的比较口腔溃疡含片与口腔溃疡散治疗复发性阿弗他溃疡的效果。方法选取复发性阿弗他溃疡患者80例,随机分为观察组与对照组各40例。观察组予口腔溃疡含片治疗,对照组予口腔溃疡散治疗。比较2组治疗有效率、疼痛评分,并随访6个月,比较2组复发情况。结果观察组总有效率92.5%,高于对照组的77.5%(P<0.05)。观察组疼痛评分为(4.6±2.7)分,对照组疼痛评分为(4.5±2.5)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访观察组复发例3例(7.5%),低于对照组的9例(22.5%)(P<0.05)。结论口腔溃疡含片与口腔溃疡散治疗复发性阿弗他溃疡的效果俱佳,含片优于散剂,且复发率更低。临床可根据患者具体情况选择用药。
Objective To compare the effect of oral ulcer lozenge and oral ulcer powder in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulcer. Methods Eighty patients with recurrent aphthous ulcer were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases). The observation group was treated with buccal ulcer buccal tablets and the control group with buccal ulcer powder. The curative effect and pain score of the two groups were compared and followed up for 6 months. The recurrence of the two groups was compared. Results The total effective rate in observation group was 92.5%, which was higher than that in control group (77.5%, P <0.05). The pain score of the observation group was (4.6 ± 2.7) points, while that of the control group was (4.5 ± 2.5) points, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Three cases (7.5%) were observed in the observation group and 9 cases (22.5%) in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Oral ulcer lozenge and oral ulcer powder treatment of recurrent aphthous ulcer effect is superb, lozenge is better than powder, and the recurrence rate is lower. Clinical choice according to the specific circumstances of patients medication.