对于本届修志的总结和评价，有的专家、学者指出：本届志书时间的大跨度和资料的缺乏，几乎成为对历史的抢救行为，而不是自觉的历史积累的结果，很有点临时拖怫脚的味道。在这样的志书中，我们经常能看到某些历史时期是大段大段的空白，它给我们提供的只是一个粗糙的历史框架 As for the summary and evaluation of the current revision of the Chi, some experts and scholars point out that the great span of this journal and the lack of information have almost become the result of the historic rescue but not the conscious accumulation of history. Stomping taste. In such a chronicle, we often see some of the historical period is a large section of the blank, it gives us only a rough historical framework