论文部分内容阅读
确定一个明确的符合罪刑法定原则的权力边界,是通过刑法变通协调少数民族习惯法和国家法冲突的关键。我国刑法规定的犯罪概念及犯罪构成是罪与刑的统一体,不存在“有罪无刑”的中间地带,一个行为只要被认定为犯罪,就应依法判处刑罚或免予处罚,禁止法外任意入罪或法内任意出罪,因此对刑法规定不能进行入罪或出罪变通。实践中可利用《刑法》第13条的但书规定,第61条、第62条、第63条的量刑规定,第36条关于经济损失赔偿的规定以及分则规定的罪量要素和兜底条款等原则或规则提供的广阔空间,对刑法规定予以变通。
Determining a clear boundary of power that meets the statutory principle of the crime and punishment is the key to coordinating the conflict between ethnic customary law and state law through the modification of criminal law. The conception of crime and constitution of crime stipulated in the criminal law of our country are the unification of crime and punishment, and there is no middle ground for “guilty innocent punishment.” An act should be sentenced to punishment or exemption from punishment as long as it is deemed as a crime. Anyone can be convicted arbitrarily or arbitrarily, so the criminal law can not be convicted or convicted. In practice, the proviso of Article 13 of the Criminal Law may be used, and the provisions of the Provisions of Articles 61, 62, and 63, the provisions of Article 36 on the compensation for economic losses, And other principles or rules provide a broad space for criminal law to be flexible.