1924年上海总商会的换届改选,一改此前当选正副会长大多推辞不就的传统,出现了前所未有的激烈纷争,也体现了在1920年代新形势下商会选举的新变化。纷争之第一阶段是穆藕初与总商会之间就相关法理问题反复进行辩论,其实质并非权利争夺;第二阶段则是“拥傅派”打着维护法理的旗号争夺会长席位,受到“拥宋派”强烈反对。此一纷争并非上海总商会内部不同籍贯之帮派间的权利之争,而是带有不同政治色彩派别之间的权利争斗,最终主要通过内部调停方式予以解决,各级官厅并未发挥明显的作用。 In 1924, the re-election of the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce changed a tradition of mostly refusing to be elected chairman and vice president. There was an unprecedented fierce dispute and a new change in the election of the chamber of commerce in the new situation in the 1920s. The first stage of the dispute is that Mu Ouchu and the chamber of commerce repeatedly debated the issue of relevant jurisprudence repeatedly. The essence of the debate was not the right to contend. The second stage was the “factionalism” , By “Yong song faction ” strongly opposed. This dispute is not a dispute over the rights among different factions within the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce, but with different political factions. Finally, the dispute is resolved mainly through internal mediation, and the government offices at all levels do not play a clear role .