通过对一名儿童的长期跟踪,本研究发现,该儿童使用的几乎都是客事“把”字句;从第30个月起其“把”字句句法结构变得复杂,但几乎没有错序;其“把”字句大多描述已然事件,谓词形式多为动补结构;其“把”字句中的NP2几乎都是有定的。结果表明,受试从开始使用“把”字句时就很好地习得了其句法、语义特性,也遵守其语义、语用限制,与“接口假说”不符。 Through the long-term follow-up of a child, this study found that almost all of the children used were off-line, and that from the 30th month, the syntactic structure of the “” “sentence became complicated, but almost There is no wrong order; its ”put “ most of the words describing the already existing events, the predicate form mostly dynamic complement structure; its ”put “ in the sentence NP2 almost always have a definite. The results show that the participants learned their syntactic and semantic properties well from the beginning when they used the ”put“ sentence, and also abided by their semantic and pragmatic limitations, which did not match the ”interface hypothesis."