论文部分内容阅读
不当得利一般条款置于民法典总则是我国立法机关无心插柳的设想,学界较少认同。仔细考察不当得利制度的发展史,尤其关注罗马法与意大利法的相关内容,会发现不当得利制度的建构并非只有德国一种路径。罗马法中的无因返还诉,以及意大利民法典规定的无因得利制度,构成德国模式以外的另一种参考对象。将体现自然法矫正市民法的思想的不当得利一般条款置于总则,构成中国民法典立法的一个备选项。
General Provisions on Unjust Enrichment Being placed in the general provisions of the Civil Code is the unwarranted assumption of the legislature of our country and less accepted by the academic community. A careful examination of the history of the development of the system of unjust enrichment, with particular regard to the content of the Roman law and the Italian law, shows that the construction of the system of unjust enrichment is not the only route to Germany. The lawless reinstatement in Roman law and the non-profit-making system stipulated in the Italian Civil Code form another reference to the German model. The General Provisions on Unjust Enrichment, which embody the idea of natural law to correct civil law, are placed in the General Provisions and constitute an alternative to the legislation of the Chinese Civil Code.