论文部分内容阅读
一对于“高句丽王为西汉边郡封国之王”的质疑首先,《两汉时期高句丽的封国地位》(刊载于《中国边疆史地研究》2004年第4期,以下简称《封国》)一文以《汉书·王莽传》、《三国志·魏书·东夷传》和《后汉书·东夷列传》中对王莽征发高句丽兵攻伐匈奴一事所导致的东北边疆动荡的相关记载为证据,分析高句丽的“西汉边郡封国之王”的地位,并且认为造成这种激烈的民族矛盾的主要原因是“王莽对少数民族封国的贬斥”。对此,笔者存有异议,认为民族矛盾根源于中央政权对高句丽等少数民族的强行征发、过度役使,而不是对高句丽
First, the question of “the king of the Goguryeo kingdom as the king of the Western Han Dynasty Bien Hoa” first of all, “the position of the Goguryeo in the Han dynasty as a seal of the state” (published in “China’s Borderland History and Research 2004 No. 4, hereinafter referred to as” the country “ ) A related account of the turmoil in the northeastern frontier caused by the attack by the Goguryeo on the Huns by Wang Mang in the Biography of the Three Kingdoms, the Biography of Wei Dong and the Biography of Dongyi in the Later Han Dynasty, as Evidence and analysis of the status of Koguryo’s ”King of the Western Han Dynasty Border Area“ and believes that the main reason for this fierce ethnic conflict is ”Wang Mang’s denigration of the minority nationalities." In this regard, I have objections, that the ethnic contradictions rooted in the central government for the Goguryeo and other ethnic minorities forced the issuance, excessive service, rather than on the Goguryeo