“工具论”之后的一系列文论话语实践,其实一直在社会学话语,或者政治意识形态话语的主导下,默默地做着回归文学理论及文学规律的努力。而这样的回归,总是受制于特定的历史阶段,因此,当远距离审视了一些典型的批评话语后,反倒觉得中国当代的批评家与作家的关系原不像人们想象的那样生疏,他们在共同书写自己的心灵体验时,早已把西方话语进行了本土化的内化处理,至少是镜像式移植。这样的工作从八十年代中期的“方法 In fact, a series of practice of literary discourse after ”instrumentalism“ has been silently doing the work of returning to the theory of literature and the law of literature under the guidance of sociological discourses or political ideological discourse. However, such a return is always subject to a specific historical stage. Therefore, when we examine some typical critic discourses from a distance, we actually feel that the relations between contemporary Chinese critics and writers were not as strange as those people imagined they were When writing together their own spiritual experience, the western discourse has long been internalized and at least mirrored. Such a work from the mid-eighties ”method