论文部分内容阅读
明明说是免费上网,到头来却多收了36元的信息费,这不明摆着是消费欺诈吗?北京的郭先生一提起这事还忿忿不平,于是在交涉没有结果的情况下,气愤之极的郭先生于2005年3月将网通公司起诉到法院,北京西城法院已正式受理了此案,目前案件正在审理中。这究竟是怎么一回事呢?郭先生说,2005年2月,他在一次超市购物时得到了一张96613免费上网卡,卡上很显眼地写着“拨打96613可免费上网”的字样。在使用该上网卡一个月后郭先生到建行交电话费时发现,除了正
Obviously it is free Internet access, in the end it has received 36 yuan more information costs, it is not clear that consumer fraud? Beijing’s Mr. Guo was also indignant at the mention of this incident, so in the case of negotiations without result, extremely angry Mr. Guo sued Netcom to court in March 2005 and Beijing Xicheng Court formally accepted the case. At present, the case is under trial. This is exactly how the matter? Mr. Guo said that in February 2005, he got a 96613 free internet card in a supermarket shopping, the card is very conspicuous to read “dial 96613 free Internet ” Words. In a month after the use of the card Mr. Guo found the phone bill to pay when found, in addition to positive