论文部分内容阅读
反补贴法律的关键之一就在于“同类产品”的确定。本文首先分析“同类产品”的法律定义,分别探讨美国、欧盟和WTO的相关司法实践标准,指出美欧实践存在较大随意性而且偏向于保护主义的解释,这种做法造成很大的商业不确定性,间接地阻碍国际自由贸易。文章结论指出WTO争端解决机构所运用的“市场分析法”有利于比较准确客观地进行“同类产品”分析,是各国在实施反补贴税法时值得借鉴的思路。
One of the keys to anti-subsidy laws lies in the determination of “similar products.” This article first analyzes the legal definition of “similar products ”, examines the relevant standards of judicial practice in the United States, the European Union and the WTO, points out that there is a great deal of arbitrariness in the practice of the United States and Europe and is biased in favor of protectionism, which has caused a great Commercial uncertainty indirectly hinders international free trade. The conclusion of the article points out that the “Market Analysis Method” used by the WTO Dispute Settlement Agency is conducive to the analysis of “similar products” more accurately and objectively, which is worth learning from when implementing countervailing duty laws in various countries.