论文部分内容阅读
请想像一下审理一起诉讼案件的情景吧:在那里,律师们几乎不对任何问题提出反对意见;传闻不是证据的规定已被废除;无论是直讯,还是反讯,都准许提出诱导性的问题;民事案件没有陪审团参加审判;不制作案情摘要;本是你的案件,却完全由别的律师进行准备;除了文件需要认定,没有任何其他待认定的材料;在审判前,你很少同你的诉讼委托人或证人会晤;当你最后终于见到你的委托人时,你们也绝口不谈酬金问题。请设想一处接近于理想的法庭吧:在那里,所有的案件都是由最优秀的法官们担任审判,他们等证据调查完毕就在法庭上即席作出判决。而且,在那里,法官们和律师们实际上都同样
Imagine the case of a trial of a lawsuit: where lawyers hardly object to any objections; rules that rumors are not proof have been abolished; inducement questions have been allowed both directly and counterintuitively; There are no juries in civil cases to participate in the trial; no summary of the case is made; this is your case, but it is entirely prepared by another lawyer; except the documents need to be identified, there is no other material to be determined; Of litigants or witnesses meet; when you finally see your client, you also must not talk about the gratuity issue. Imagine a near-ideal court: where all the cases are judged by the best judges, who make judgments in court on completion of the investigation. And there, judges and lawyers are virtually the same there