论文部分内容阅读
对审前准备程序及其程序价值进行分析厘定,认为我国现有的民事诉讼审前准备程序立法容易导致法官预断,职权色彩过重,缺乏对当事人诉讼权利的保护,未赋予审前准备活动程序上的效力。指出目前对于审前准备程序的规定存在四方面问题:对证据交换内容的规定过于原则化;当事人收集证据的保障措施不完善;审前准备程序适用范围过窄;缺乏对答辩失权的规定。提出我国构建审前准备程序应遵循的原则及措施,通过扩大简易程序的适用范围、设置答辩失权制度、完善现有证据制度、建立准备法官制度、完善调解及和解制度等途径,健全我国民事诉讼审前准备程序。
The pretrial preparation procedure and the value of its procedure are analyzed and determined. It is considered that the legislation of the pretrial preparation procedure in our country can lead to the judge prejudging, the over-representation of authority, the lack of protection of litigation right of the litigant, On the effectiveness. The author points out that there are four problems in the pretrial preparation procedure: the provisions on the content of evidence exchange are too general; the imperfect measures for the parties to collect evidence; the narrow scope of pretrial preparation procedure; and the lack of the right to reply. Put forward the principles and measures that our country should follow in order to construct the pre-trial preparation procedure, and improve the application of the summary procedure by setting the system of the defense of the right of defense, perfecting the existing evidence system, establishing the system of preparing judges, improving the system of mediation and reconciliation, Proceedings before litigation.