论文部分内容阅读
在20世纪30年代关于中国文化出路的争论的大背景下,《再生》强调文化是时代性与民族性的集合体,认为西化派与本位文化派的主张“原来可以并行不背”。但《再生》并非不偏不倚,在对待传统文化问题上,与本位文化派主张有契合之处,而与西化派主张多有龃龉,尤其是反对西化派对传统文化的全面批判,强调要珍视与发掘传统文化的优良因素,以建立民族自信。深层观之,《再生》与西化派的文化主张其实存在相互会通之处,都是希望在世界文化一体化的格局中,创造出一种既有民族特色又有世界意味的真正的“中国本位”的文化,反映了他们深刻的爱国意识与民族主义情怀。
In the context of the controversy on the way out of Chinese culture in the 1930s, Rebirth emphasizes that culture is a collection of the times and nationalities. It believes that the Westernized factions and the cult of their own culture “could not be parallel”. However, “regeneration” is not impartial. On the issue of treating traditional culture, it is in accord with the idea of a cult of a certain kind of culture. However, it has more covetous opinions with the Westernizationists, especially the comprehensive criticism of the traditional culture of the westernization party. Discover the fine elements of traditional culture to build national confidence. From a deep perspective, the cultural ideas of “regeneration” and westernizationist parties actually exist and will both hope to create a true “ China-based ”culture, reflecting their profound sense of patriotism and nationalism.