论文部分内容阅读
不纯正不作为犯作为义务包括形式来源与实质来源两种渊源。其二者受到实质来源运动诸因素的影响,形成了以形式来源表征不纯正不作为犯的构成要件,而以实质来源表征不纯正不作为犯的实质违法性的独特关系。应当以形式来源为主,实质来源为补充来构建不纯正不作为犯的作为义务来源理论。一方面,形式来源从限制不纯正不作为犯成立范围和规制不作为犯罪人故意两个角度,来限制不纯正不作为犯的成立范围。另一方面,实质来源从实质正义、刑法独立性和故意规制三个角度对形式来源进行补充。
Impure omission as an obligation includes both formal sources and substantive sources. Both of them are influenced by the factors of the real source movement, forming the unique elements that represent the source of impure innocence by formal sources, and the substantive source characterizes the substantive illegality of impure omission. The main source of formality should be formal sources, which should be supplemented to construct impure omissions as the source of obligation. On the one hand, formal sources limit the establishment of impure omissions from the point of view of imposing restrictions on impunity and intentional regulation of impunity. On the other hand, the substantive sources supplement the formal sources from three aspects: substantive justice, criminal law independence and intentional regulation.