论文部分内容阅读
在文化遗产保护的今天,专家学者的声音大多以“保护”为重,把“开发”或者“创意”完全当做对立面,甚至认为在保护文化遗产的今天,把保护和开发并举是危险的想法。在学界这几乎成为一个尴尬的话题。因为讨论最终会成为“一种”声音:“保护和传承”毕竟可以留住,而“开发或创意”的结果不可预料。其实文化遗产保护工作不能只有一种声音。可以针对不同的保护对象采取不同的开发和保护措施,开发和保护相辅相成,并行不悖。生产性保护和产业化保护不是一回事;商业性经营和产业化经营不是一回事。要把“生产性保护”和“非遗”“产业化”区别开来。我们在弄清了当前文化遗产保护和开发中出现的各种情况,弄清了概念的本质区别后,就应明白保护中的开发其实并不可怕,可怕的是概念混乱带来的工作的混乱。
In the protection of cultural heritage today, the voices of experts and scholars mostly regard “protection ” as their priority and their “development ” or “creativity ” as a complete antithesis. They even think that in the protection of cultural heritage today, the protection and development Together is a dangerous idea. This is almost an awkward topic in academia. Because the discussion will eventually become “a” sound: “protection and inheritance” can be retained after all, and the result of “development or creativity” is unpredictable. In fact, cultural heritage protection can not only be a voice. Different protection and protection measures can be taken for different protection objects, and development and protection are mutually reinforcing and go hand in hand. Productive protection and industrialization protection are not the same thing; commercial management and industrial management are not the same thing. The distinction between “production protection” and “non-heritage” “industrialization” should be distinguished. Having figured out the various situations that have taken place in the current protection and development of the cultural heritage and clarified the essential differences between the concepts, we should understand that the development in the protection is not terrible. The horrible thing is that the chaos in the work caused by the concept disorder .