论文部分内容阅读
总的评价是好的,体现了考查能力、开发智力的方向,有助于推动语文教改的方向。由于诸多方面的因素,今年语文考题还存在如下问题:1、对考生阅读能力的考查,在一定程度上超越了考生的实际水平。阅读的材料有些过深过难,不是文字不懂、而是涉及到不少专业知识和术语,超过了大纲规定学生能够独立阅读一般科技论文的水平要求。例如,考查的阅读材料是经典论著,好多名词第一次碰到,什么“蒙昧社会”、“野蛮社会”、“文明社会”,“相对长度形成一种概念”、“同源”、“人类学”……对学生阅读能力的考查,应该不断提高要求,但应遵循循序渐进、
The overall evaluation is good, reflecting the direction of the ability to examine and develop intelligence, which is conducive to promoting the direction of language teaching reform. Due to many factors, this year’s linguistic examination questions still have the following problems: 1. Examination of candidates’ reading ability surpasses the actual level of candidates to some extent. Some of the materials read were too deep, not in words, but in terms of professional knowledge and terminology. They exceeded the syllabus and allow students to independently read the level of general scientific and technological dissertations. For example, the reading materials examined are classic works, many terms encountered for the first time, what is the “deceptive society”, “barbaric society”, “civilized society”, “relative length forms a concept”, “homologous”, "human Learning”... The examination of students’ reading ability should be continuously improved, but it should follow a gradual,