论文部分内容阅读
为了比较国内外学术期刊文后参考文献的著录情况,本课题组从三种国外权威的医学期刊(The Lancet,JAMA,N Engl J Med)入手,统计了同一时段(1996年1～3月)的各期,将其文后参考文献的情况逐一录入计算机,进行特殊项目的百分率统计、年限统计。结果,三种期刊的篇均引文数分别为7.3,15.3和14.4;引文年限统计为60%左右的引文为近5年的,但引文最久的可以达100多年。引文中期刊的比例达83.8%～89.3%,约有1%的引文为会议资料性的。引文语种中,英语占99%以上。期刊自引为8.7%～15.2%,略高于一般学科水平。本课题组认为,各引文指标都可反映一个期刊的学术水平,国内期刊有些指标与此三种期刊接近,但是不少期刊仍然落后。在引文数量的限制上,本课题组认为不应为节约版面而压缩引文;在会议资料的引用上,可以提倡多引用些大型会议资料。
In order to compare the bibliographic description of the academic journals in both China and foreign countries, the research group started with three foreign authoritative medical journals (The Lancet, JAMA, N Engl J Med) and counted the same period (from January to March 1996) Of the various periods, the text after the reference to the situation one by one into the computer, the percentage of special projects statistics, the number of years statistics. As a result, the citations per article for the three journals were 7.3, 15.3 and 14.4 respectively; citation statistics for about 60% of citations were nearly five years, but the longest citation could reach more than 100 years. Citation periodicals ratio of 83.8% to 89.3%, about 1% of citations for the meeting of information. Citation language, English accounted for more than 99%. Journals cited as 8.7% ~ 15.2%, slightly higher than the general level of discipline. Our group believes that all cited indicators can reflect the academic level of a journal, some of the indicators of domestic journals close to these three journals, but many journals are still behind. In terms of the quota, the research group believes that citation should not be compressed for the sake of saving the layout. In the quotation of the conference materials, we can promote more references to large-scale conference materials.