论文部分内容阅读
互联网企业垄断的话题因为3Q大战而变得引人注目,广东高院详细的一审判决书已经将诸多争议的法律问题提出,从而在最高法院引发进一步讨论。根据《反垄断法》的规定,首先要认定某个企业的商品(产品和服务的总称)在相关市场是否具有支配地位,其次判断它是否滥用了这种地位。在本案中,关键是通过商品替代性分析和地域市场分析来界定即时通讯软件所属的相关市
The topic of Internet monopoly by corporations became noticeable as a result of the 3Q war. The detailed first instance verdict of the Guangdong High Court has raised many controversial legal issues, triggering further discussions in the Supreme Court. According to the provisions of the AML, it is first necessary to determine whether an enterprise’s commodities (a collective term for products and services) have a dominant position in the relevant market and secondly determine whether it abuses this status. In this case, the key is to define the relevant cities to which the instant messaging software belongs by the commodity alternative analysis and the geographical market analysis