论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨牙痛不同治疗方法的效果。方法选取本院96例牙痛患者，随机分成观察组及对照组各48例，观察组采取中药汤剂服用加腕踝针埋针法穴位治疗；对照组采取抗菌药及止痛药口服，必要时给予外用药液漱口或冲洗，仪器或手术治疗，对比两组患者临床疗效及不良反应发生率。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率为97.92%，对照组患者治疗总有效率为85.42%，两组疗效比较，差异有统计学意义(2=4.91，<0.05)；观察组患者不良反应发生率明显低于对照组，两组比较差异显著(2=7.20，<0.05)；而对照组患者治疗镇痛效果明显高于观察组，两组比较有显著差异(=18.01，<0.01)。结论采取中西医结合治疗牙痛，更有利于提高患者疗效，值得基层医院推广应用。“,”Objective To explore the toothache the ef ect of dif erent treatments. Methods Select 96 cases in our hospital patients with toothache, randomly divided into observation group and the control group (n= 48), observation group to take Chinese traditional medicine medicinal broth using the wrist ankle needle buried acupuncture point treatment;Oral control group take antimicrobials and painkil ers, if necessary, to give topical solution gargle or flushing, instrument or surgical treatment, compared two groups of patients with clinical ef icacy and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results The observation group of patients treatment the total ef ective rate was 97.92%, control group patients treatment the total ef ective rate was 85.42%, two groups of curative ef ect comparison, the dif erence was statistical y significant ( 2= 4.91, < 0.05); Observation group of patients significantly lower than control group in incidence of adverse reactions, the two groups was significant dif erence ( 2=7.20, <0.05);While the control group patients analgesic ef ect is significantly higher than the observation group, comparing the two groups have significant dif erence ( =18.01, <0.01). Conclusion Combine traditional Chinese and western medicine to treat toothache, more conducive to improve patient curative ef ect, is worth wide use in the basic-level hospitals.