论文部分内容阅读
基于因道路碰瓷行为刑法定性而引发的分歧,提出道路碰瓷者虚构事实、隐瞒真相使被害人自愿交付财物的应定为诈骗罪,被害人因遭受威胁、恐吓等心理压力被迫交付财物的应认定为敲诈勒索罪,当其实施的行为使不特定或者大多数人的生命及财产安全处于危险状态时,应结合具体手段行为与结果行为具有牵连性,择一重罪处罚认定为以危险方法危害公共安全罪。旨在法律上明确道路碰瓷行为的定性,从而起到警示作用,打击类似犯罪发生。
Based on the disagreement caused by the law of the criminal law, the author put forward that the road should be falsified and the truth should be hidden so that the victims will voluntarily deliver the property should be regarded as the crime of fraud. When the victim is forced to deliver the property due to threats, intimidation and other psychological pressure If the act of execution makes the life and property safety of the unspecified or the majority of people in danger, it should be linked with the concrete means and result behavior, and choose a felony punishment as dangerous by the dangerous method Public safety crime. The purpose of the law is to clarify the characterization of the road to touch porcelain and thus serve as a warning function against similar crimes.