论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析插管式面罩给氧与鼻导管给氧技术在无痛胃镜检查中的临床效果。方法:选择需行胃镜检查的患者70例,将其随机分为两组,通过插管式面罩给氧的为试验组(T组,n=35),通过鼻导管给氧的为对照组(C组,n=35)。在检查过程中分别检测两组患者的脉搏血氧饱和度、袖带血压、心率及操作时间,并进行对比。结果:C组血氧饱和度(SPO2)在麻醉诱导后至检查结束期间明显降低,与诱导前相比,有统计学差异(P<0.05),而T组无此现象。但两组血氧饱和度、操作时间、心率、血压(收缩压和舒张压)无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:应用插管式面罩给氧技术进行无痛胃镜检查,在维持患者血氧饱和度(SPO2)及生命体征指标上要优于使用鼻导管给氧,可使无痛胃镜检查更为安全有效。
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the clinical effect of intubation mask oxygen therapy and nasal catheter oxygenation technique in painless gastroscopy. Methods: Seventy patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly divided into two groups: the oxygenated test group (T group, n = 35), the oxygenated nasal catheter Group C, n = 35). During the examination, the pulse oximetry, cuff blood pressure, heart rate and operation time of the two groups were detected and compared. Results: The oxygen saturation (SPO2) in group C decreased significantly from the time of induction of anesthesia to the end of examination, which was significantly lower than that before induction (P <0.05), but not in group T. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in oxygen saturation, operating time, heart rate and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic pressure) (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The painless gastroscopy with intubation mask oxygenation technique is superior to nasal catheter in maintaining oxygen saturation (SPO2) and vital signs of patients, which makes gastroscopy more safe and effective .