论文部分内容阅读
受罗尔斯政治哲学的影响,学界对康德的目的王国理念有一种准政治性的解读,即将其理解为具有同等道德地位的公民交互立法的一种民主秩序的规范性理念,或者同类人之间在道德上共同合作的政治立法的理念。这一理念的首要目的就是促进个人对自律的卓有成效的寻求。这类解读的主要动机,是要证明康德道德哲学持续的实践意义,并且以此对其作为一种“空洞的形式主义”的传统理解方式提出质疑。但康德的定言命令式及其包含的目的王国理念都必须从一种实质性的实践形而上学的角度去考察,这种形而上学在理论上是不可证明的,却仍然是出自于纯粹实践理性的非人类学研究视域。学界的政治化解读,究其原因,就在于忽视了道德理念的这种实践上的实在性。
Under the influence of Rawls’s political philosophy, the academic community has a quasi-political interpretation of Kant’s concept of the kingdom of purpose, that is, to understand it as a normative concept of democratic order with the citizen’s interactive legislation of equal moral status, The concept of political legislation that is ethically co-operative. The primary purpose of this philosophy is to promote an effective search for personal self-discipline. The main motivation for this interpretation is to prove the continuing practical significance of Kant’s moral philosophy and to challenge its traditional understanding as a “hollow formalism.” However, Kant’s imperative imperative and the concept of the kingdom of purpose that it contains must all be examined from a substantive practical metaphysical perspective. This metaphysics is irrefutable in theory but is still derived from purely practical reason. Anthropological research horizon. The reason why the politicized interpretation of the academic field studies is that it ignores this practical reality of moral ideas.