在去年科学规划会议上,我讲过厚今薄古的问题,引起了一些讨论。有的文章写得很好,比如郭沫若同志、范文澜同志的文章就写得很好,比我讲的要好。但是,也有人对厚今薄古这个提法作了错误的理解,在思想上有点混乱。例如,有人曾经认为提倡厚今薄古,就可以对历史遗产、文化遗产采取粗暴的态度,这就完全不符合我们原来的意思了。要不要接受历史遗产、文化遗产的问题,对我们马克思主义者说来,是在原则上早已解 At last year’s Science Planning Conference, I talked about the issue of thick and thin this time and caused some discussions. Some articles are very well written, such as Comrade Guo Moruo and Fan Wenlan, whose articles are well written and better than what I said. However, some people have misunderstood the term “ancient and modern” and are somewhat confused in their thinking. For example, some people once thought that the promotion of both ancient and modern times would lead to a crude attitude toward the historical heritage and cultural heritage. This totally does not meet our original meaning. Whether or not to accept the historical heritage and cultural heritage issues has already been solved in principle to our Marxists