论文部分内容阅读
职工白某于1996年11月受聘于某单位,事发前是复卷车间乙班第三组的界球工。复卷车间乙班第三组共有7名工人,1人开复卷机,1人开界球机,4人包球,1人包装,属流水线作业。2000年1月14日晚上,白某所在班组从7时开工至次日早上,约凌晨2时,生产过程中复卷机粘纸,白某离开自己的岗位到运行中的复卷机取粘纸时右手拇指被卷入压伤。2000年10月18日,某单位向某市劳动局提交申请,要求市劳动局对白某受伤是否属工伤作出认定。2001年1月9日,某市劳动局作出白某受伤属工伤的认定。单位不服,因此申请劳动行政复议。复议机关认为:白某所在的复卷车间乙班三组是
Employee Bai was employed by a certain unit in November 1996 and before the incident was the ball handler for the third group of the second division of the rewinding workshop. Rewinding Workshop B third group of a total of seven workers, a rewinder open, a ball machine open world, 4 people ball, 1 person packaging, is a pipeline operation. On the evening of January 14, 2000, Baimu's shift team started from 7am to the next morning at about 2am. During the production process, the rewinder stuck paper and Bai left his post to take up the rewinding machine in operation The right hand thumb is involved in the crushing of the paper. On October 18, 2000, an employer submitted an application to the Labor Bureau of a city asking the Municipal Bureau of Labor to make a determination as to whether the injury was caused by a certain injury. January 9, 2001, a city labor bureau made a white injured is the identification of work-related injuries. The unit refused to accept the application for labor administrative reconsideration. Reconsideration authority that: White where the rewinding workshop Class B three groups