论文部分内容阅读
使用盗窃的可罚性基准不是主观的非法占有目的,而是客观的实质损害。使用盗窃的可罚性应以相当的利用可能性妨害作为判断标准,相当的利用可能性妨害须综合盗用时间的长短、使用盗窃的对象、财物的保存状况等因素来判定。司法解释对偷开机动车辆的部分定性结论存在疑问,不必对使用盗窃单独设罪,但是应对使用盗窃设立专门的处罚规定。
The basis of the penalty for the use of theft is not a subjective purpose of illegal possession, but an objective real injury. Penalties for the use of theft should be judged on the basis of the possibility of exploitation as a criterion of judgment, and the degree of possibility of utilization hinges on the length of time required for the purpose of the theft, the object of theft, the state of preservation of the belongings, and the like. Judicial interpretation has doubts about some of the qualitative findings of stealing a motor vehicle without having to set separate charges for the theft, but there should be a specific penalties for the theft.