论文部分内容阅读
作为经济犯罪构成要件要素之一的“违反××法律、法规”(一般违法),与该行为总体上所违反的刑法规范(刑事法规),共同构成了经济犯罪具有的双重违法结构模式。由于刑法中许多犯罪都是以违反行政法规或者经济法规为前提的,司法人员要正确解释刑法条文,就必须要清楚相关行政法规和经济法规的具体规定。由于经济犯罪中的许多犯罪直接来源于非刑事法律的相关规定,在填补这些空白刑法时,不能脱离部门法的相关规定去阐述相关的犯罪构成。正当化事由具有行政从属性,即因行政机关的许可或核准而阻却行政犯罪构成要件,反之才具有可罚性。
As one of the elements that constitute an economic crime, the “violation of XX laws and regulations” (general violation of law) and the criminal code (criminal laws and regulations) generally violated by the act constitute the double illegal structure model of economic crimes . Because many crimes in the criminal law are based on the violation of administrative regulations or economic laws and regulations as a prerequisite, judicial personnel to correctly interpret the provisions of criminal law, we must be clear about the relevant administrative regulations and economic laws and regulations of the specific provisions. Because many crimes in economic crimes are directly derived from the relevant provisions of non-criminal law, these blank criminal law should not be divorced from the relevant provisions of the relevant departmental laws in elaborating relevant criminal constitutions. Legitimation must have the administrative subordination, that is, the administrative organs must approve or obviate the constitutional elements of administrative crimes, and vice versa.