论文部分内容阅读
当前的这一轮结构调整是在比例关系严重失衡情况下不得己的选择。结构调整,说到底是一种存量调整;但它可以通过两大途径来实现:一条途径是直接针对存量进行行政性的调整,另一条途径是通过增量(投资)来逐步改变存量结构,其中包括普遍的或有重点的技术改造。毫无疑义的是,在整个调整期间两种手段必须并用。在这个前提下,出现了两个争议较大的问题:一是在3年调整期间到底以直接存量调整为主,还是以增量调整为主?二是在3年调整期间,单就增量调整而言,到底以基础产业的投资为主,还是以普遍的产品结构调整和技术进步为主?需要
The current round of structural readjustment is an inevitable choice in the context of a serious imbalance in the proportional relations. Structural adjustment, in the final analysis, is a kind of stock adjustment; but it can be achieved in two ways: one approach is to make administrative adjustments directly to stocks and the other is to gradually change the stock structure through incremental investment Including common or focused technological transformations. Undoubtedly, the two instruments must be used together throughout the adjustment period. Under this premise, there are two controversial issues: First, whether direct stock adjustment is the major factor during the three-year adjustment period or incremental adjustment? Second, during the three-year adjustment period, the one-ups alone In terms of adjustment, what are the major investments in basic industries or the general adjustment of product structure and technological progress?