论文部分内容阅读
新文化运动是一场思想运动或文化运动,而法律则是国家权力的运作活动,思想与制度的差异性导致了主流法律史中新文化运动的缺失。政权变换频繁,法律的现代化却保持着一贯的方向。新文化运动是西方精神联合社会主义思潮攻击中国固有法律传统,与百年法律史的主流既契合通融,又龃龉难入。法律百年史中的中国传统、西方法治和共产主义法制三种文化元素混合性特征,同样存在于新文化运动之中。鲁迅小说中“虚拟故事”的法律叙事结构,以及胡适政治思想的三次转换,都展现了三种不同文化在法律中的冲突与融合。然而,新文化运动所倡导的思想风暴、政治变革和社会改良,并没有触及私法领域内的中华习俗。妻妾制度与“父债子还”等身份法,依然保持着中国固有的传统,甚至援引着大清帝国的法律。
The new culture movement is a thought movement or a cultural movement, while the law is the operation of state power. The difference between thought and system leads to the absence of the new cultural movement in the mainstream legal history. Changing the regime frequently, the modernization of the law has maintained a consistent direction. The new cultural movement is an innate legal tradition in which the Western spirit and the socialist trend of thought have attacked China. It is compatible with the mainstream of the law history in the past century, and it is hard to cope. The mixed features of the three kinds of cultural elements of Chinese tradition, Western rule of law and the communist legal system in the centenary of law also exist in the New Culture Movement. The legal narrative structure of “virtual story” and the three conversions of Hu Shih’s political thoughts in Lu Xun’s novels all show the conflict and integration of the three different cultures in the law. However, the ideological storms, political changes and social reforms advocated by the New Culture Movement have not touched the Chinese customs in the field of private law. The system of identification of wives and concubinage with the “debt of the father” still retains the inherent Chinese tradition and even invokes the law of the Qing Empire.