一作为小说家的池莉,无论是读者评价,还是文学史定位,似无争议。近几年,《大家》《上海文学》等杂志相继刊发了池莉的组诗,有些甚至还被《诗选刊》这样的专业诗歌刊物转载。这些好像都表明:作为诗人的池莉开始逐渐进入我们的视野,她正在以另一种面孔让我们记住,她并未离开文学。在此,我并非要否认池莉作为诗人的合法性,这个问题实际上也不是由谁说了算。身份认同,我想对于池莉本人来说,她根本没在意,不想写小说,写写诗怎么了?不 As a novelist Chi Li, whether it is reader evaluation, or the history of literary history, it seems uncontested. In recent years, magazines such as “Everyone” and “Shanghai Literature” have successively published Chi Li’s poems, and some have even been reprinted by professional poetry publications such as “Selected Poems”. These all seem to indicate that Chi Li, as a poet, has gradually come into our field of vision. She is remembered by another face that she has not left the literature. At this point, I am not going to deny the legitimacy of Chi Li as a poet. In fact, this issue is not really decided by anyone. Identity, I think for Chi Li himself, she did not care about, do not want to write a novel, write poetry what happened?