论文部分内容阅读
胡铁岩先生透过清代几位吴兴闵氏的科举履历,发文强烈质疑笔者先前所提出闵焕元即闵大章的说法。然因其对此议题抱有先入为主的预设立场,且在运用文献时不只一次只选择对己说有利的内容,以致他所提出的诸多论述,屡屡流于主观且逻辑有欠周全。反倒是这些履历凸显吴兴闵氏有多达二十几位辈分同于振文、焕元父子的族人,他们在曹雪芹归旗期间曾就读或任教于北京的教育圈。而此恰与曹雪芹返京后最主要的生活圈相重叠。
Mr. Hu Tieyan through several Qing Dynasty Wuxing Min’s resume, issued a document strongly questioned the author previously proposed Min Huan Yuan Min Min that. However, because of its preconceived notion of position on this subject, and in the application of the document, he has not only chosen only the favorable content himself but also has repeatedly subconsciously expressed his logic and lack of comprehensiveness. On the contrary, these biographies highlight that there are as many as 20 or so wuxing Min’s clan members who share the same seniority with Yu Zhenwen and Hwan Yuen and their sons and daughters. They studied or taught in Beijing’s education circle during the reign of Cao Xueqin. This coincides with the return of Cao Xueqin to Beijing after the most important living area overlap.