论文部分内容阅读
依据1982年《联合国海洋法公约》、国家实践以及国际司法与仲裁实践,分析了中日两国争议的“冲之鸟”之国际法律地位,认为“冲之鸟”只能赋予12海里的领海,不应该享有200海里专属经济区。并且认为,根据“冲之鸟”位于我国东海大陆架上这一特殊地理位置,“冲之鸟”的法律地位对我国东海大陆架具有重大影响。
Based on the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the practice of the State, and the practice of international judicial and arbitration, this paper analyzes the international legal status of the “red bird” in dispute between China and Japan and holds that “red bird” can only be given The territorial sea of 12 nautical miles should not enjoy the 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone. And that, according to the special geographic location of “red bird” located on the continental shelf of China’s East China Sea, the legal status of “red bird” has a significant impact on the continental shelf in the East China Sea.