论文部分内容阅读
东京审判从准备、开庭、进行,直到结束,时时刻刻面临着政治影响和舆论压力。法官们巧妙地避开了重大原则的论战,他们把案件的争点从法律的有无问题转化为法律的解释问题。法官们求助于法律推理的方法,在法律规范之内和之外寻找各种判决的根据和理由,综合运用形式推理和实质推理的方法,从而为判决提供正当性证明。法官们借助法律推理的方法完成审判的使命,而不至于堕入对某一原则的论战。
Tokyo trial from preparation, the court, proceeding, until the end, always facing political influence and public opinion pressure. Judges skilfully evaded the polemics of major principles and they turned the issue of the case from the lawlessness to the legal interpretation. The judges resort to the method of legal reasoning to find out the grounds and reasons of various judgments both within and outside the legal norms and to make use of formal reasoning and substantive reasoning methods to justify the verdict. Judges use the method of legal reasoning to fulfill the mission of judgment without falling prey to the controversy over a principle.